Aaawwww.
Ain't that a cute little kitty-cat?
No, I just grabbed the first image I saw that said "pillow soft".
Went on yet another Pachaug rock pile ride yesterday (Saturday) with the re-revalved forks on the WR-250FP.
Result?
Much better at absorbing all of those pesky sharp bumps, so the base valve piston with the bigger oil flow ports combined with a reshuffling of the valving shims of the base valve worked as far as getting a more supple feel over the sharp bumps.
The fork now feels like it actually wants to move when I hit a sharp bump, and in this respect the fork is working OK.
There is a trade-off (as with most things in life and with dirt bikes) that I had anticipated, and that is if the fork is valved for a softer overall ride, it will sink down a bit further into the travel and ride at a lower height, making the front end of the bike feel lower.
Since I lowered the oil level 5mm last Monday morning (before the re-revalve), that is adding to the low front end feeling.
It is not such a problem that I can't ride the bike, but it does go against how I like my bikes to feel while in motion as it tends to take away from overall stability while at speed.
So, the first thing to do is to add fork oil and get the oil level back to the original 140mm level and see how that feels.
I added a bit of oil to each fork leg after I got home yesterday via the shortcut method of injecting it through the air bleeder hole in each fork cap.
While this in muuuuuuch faster than doing it the precise way of disassembling the front of the bike and actually measuring the oil level in each for leg, the trade-off (another one?) is that I'm simply guessing as to how much oil I actually added.
In a conservative move, I added just a tiny bit (a few CC of oil), so we'll see how it feels on today's Pachaug rock n' roll pile ride.
The actual ride was a decent one.
I felt OK and pulled some nice moved on the bike.
I hit a couple of bumps that I didn't see coming and had a couple of squirrelly moments, but nothing I didn't survive - I'll be aware of them, today.
There were several tree limbs down across the trail in places, and I wondered if they fell there all by themselves, or if some nature-walking yahoo did it.
I stopped and moved one of the smaller ones out of the way, so I did my good deed for the day.
It rained overnight so the ground is wet at the moment, and I'm going to wait a bit in order for some of that water to dry-up - those tree roots and rocks can be very slippery when they're all wet and shiny.
Edit:
I went for a Sunday Pachaug ride today, but I think it was done under an omen of some sort.
Just before I was to load the bike up into the truck, I realized I had a flat front tire.
Nice.
I was a slow leak so I didn't even know I had a pinched tube until the air hissssssssssed out over night and into the wee hours of the morning and into late morning and into departure time.
Good thing I keep spare tire tubes around.
Changing the tube cost about 45 minutes but I eventually made it out to the ol' Pachaug enduro loop.
It was there that I realized two more things:
1) The oil I added to the forks didn't make things better, but worse.
The forks now felt like there was too much oil in them, so the plush feel they had yesterday basically vanished and they felt more like their old selves.
God, and I only added a drop, too.
Touchy.
They now rode higher like I wanted them too, but I missed the plusher feel over the sharp bumps.
Jesus, talk about having to choose between the two.
During the week, I'll ONCE AGAIN remove the forks (for the LAST FUCKING TIME for a while, I do hope), lower the oil level to 145mm, and LEAVE IT THE HELL ALONE!!!
If I want to experiment with ride height and front/rear balance, I'll do it with fork tube height and/or rear suspension settings.
2) I didn't feel as aggressive or ride the bike as well as yesterday.
Partly because the crummier-feeling forks bummed me out, partly because the bright sunshine reflecting off those pesky rocky trails fucked with my vision, and partly because that's just the mood I woke up in.
Sue me. ;)
I resorted to riding the bike pretty dang slowly since I didn't feel all that great and my vision wasn't as good as yesterday's cloudy day was, but it was better than crashing, Bucky.
I still did 55 miles and became more familiar still with the southern portion of the loop, so, it wasn't a total loss of a day.
On the bright side, the forecast weather for the coming jerk week is dry and sunny, and that will dry-up the rain water we got over the weekend.
That's always a good thing because there will be less mucky shit to deal with on the next ride.
Plus, I'll have the front suspension dialed-in to where it was yesterday, which was certainly ridable.
Until then,
-John
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
393: Fork Off - Again
Well, it's time to fork off once more.
Take the forks off the WR-250FP and bring them to Tom the suspension guy at Nasin Machine, that is.
Gee.
Seems I did this just a couple of days ago.
I spoke with Tom yesterday (Tuesday) about how the work done has changed how they feel, and Tom took that info and told me to get the forks back to him today so he can perform another valving change in time for the weekend.
He mentioned he wants to modify the base valve shim stack (little flat washer-looking thingies that control damping oil flow by bending on demand and uncovering a valve hole or port when the fork hits a bump) for a softer feel over sharp bumps.
He also said that he has just discovered that he should enlarge the base valve port size in order to flow more oil, period.
Hmmmm.
Stay tuned for the shakedown ride coming up this weekend.
-John
Take the forks off the WR-250FP and bring them to Tom the suspension guy at Nasin Machine, that is.
Gee.
Seems I did this just a couple of days ago.
I spoke with Tom yesterday (Tuesday) about how the work done has changed how they feel, and Tom took that info and told me to get the forks back to him today so he can perform another valving change in time for the weekend.
He mentioned he wants to modify the base valve shim stack (little flat washer-looking thingies that control damping oil flow by bending on demand and uncovering a valve hole or port when the fork hits a bump) for a softer feel over sharp bumps.
He also said that he has just discovered that he should enlarge the base valve port size in order to flow more oil, period.
Hmmmm.
Stay tuned for the shakedown ride coming up this weekend.
-John
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
392 Drops of Oil on the Floor
I meant to post last evening (Monday), but I forgot to do so.
Being tired and hungry probably had something to do with that.
So, here it is on Tuesday morning.
I woke on Labor Day morning feeling considerably better than the few days before because I got closer to eight hours of sleep.
That always starts me off on the right foot.
I decided to roll the dice and lower the oil level in the forks of the WR-250FP in an attempt to reduce the feeling of too much high-speed compression damping over all of those sharp (and pesky and numerous) bumps out there on the ol' Pachaug enduro loop.
The oil level was at the standard 140mm level, and I reduced it to 145mm.
How is 145 a lower level than 140?
It's measured from the top of the fork down to the oil, not from the bottom up to the top of the oil.
That's at least partially because the reason for doing this is to increase the amount of trapped air that is between the oil and the cap on top of the forks.
It's also done like that because it's easier.
This air gets compressed as the fork compresses, and not surprisingly, it also acts as an air spring.
The larger volume of air (because there is now less oil making room for more air) is easier to compress because the fork is now trying to compress the air into a larger space instead of a smaller space.
Geddit?
Physics is all around us, folks, like it or not, so you may as well like it, Bucky.
And, the result?
A noticeable improvement in the area where the fork suffers - the pesky sharp bumps were a bit easier to manage and weren't quite as bothersome as the day before, so it was worth doing the work.
The trade-off is that the front of the bike rode a bit lower (enough to notice), and that's usually something I don't like to feel.
It's the same case here, but at least it wasn't so much that is was unacceptable, so it seemed like a decent trade.
What I'll do before the next ride (assuming Tom doesn't get a crack at another revalve session before the next ride) is to lower the fork legs 1 mm to compensate for the lower ride height.
Of course, this is all a Band Aid until I get the fork valved to my satisfaction.
It is at least ridable right now, but not any better than the stock specification.
Worse, actually, because the current spec seems to not work too well over more trail mileage.
At least Tom will have a better understanding of what is needed for session #2, which I guess will be next week since this is a shortened work week due to yesterday's holiday off.
See?
Another trade-off.
Other than that, the ride was better than on Sunday.
I generally felt better and a bit more alert with a less tired feeling, although I should have had a peanut butter and jelly sandwich just before I left because my stomach felt a bit empty during the ride.
That tends to steal concentration away.
I made a few stupid maneuvers on the bike where I stalled the engine because I was trying to be too cautious for some reason, but no catastrophes, thankfully.
Blame it on the stomach.
The bike ran very well, by the way.
Off to jerk,
-John
Being tired and hungry probably had something to do with that.
So, here it is on Tuesday morning.
I woke on Labor Day morning feeling considerably better than the few days before because I got closer to eight hours of sleep.
That always starts me off on the right foot.
I decided to roll the dice and lower the oil level in the forks of the WR-250FP in an attempt to reduce the feeling of too much high-speed compression damping over all of those sharp (and pesky and numerous) bumps out there on the ol' Pachaug enduro loop.
The oil level was at the standard 140mm level, and I reduced it to 145mm.
How is 145 a lower level than 140?
It's measured from the top of the fork down to the oil, not from the bottom up to the top of the oil.
That's at least partially because the reason for doing this is to increase the amount of trapped air that is between the oil and the cap on top of the forks.
It's also done like that because it's easier.
This air gets compressed as the fork compresses, and not surprisingly, it also acts as an air spring.
The larger volume of air (because there is now less oil making room for more air) is easier to compress because the fork is now trying to compress the air into a larger space instead of a smaller space.
Geddit?
Physics is all around us, folks, like it or not, so you may as well like it, Bucky.
And, the result?
A noticeable improvement in the area where the fork suffers - the pesky sharp bumps were a bit easier to manage and weren't quite as bothersome as the day before, so it was worth doing the work.
The trade-off is that the front of the bike rode a bit lower (enough to notice), and that's usually something I don't like to feel.
It's the same case here, but at least it wasn't so much that is was unacceptable, so it seemed like a decent trade.
What I'll do before the next ride (assuming Tom doesn't get a crack at another revalve session before the next ride) is to lower the fork legs 1 mm to compensate for the lower ride height.
Of course, this is all a Band Aid until I get the fork valved to my satisfaction.
It is at least ridable right now, but not any better than the stock specification.
Worse, actually, because the current spec seems to not work too well over more trail mileage.
At least Tom will have a better understanding of what is needed for session #2, which I guess will be next week since this is a shortened work week due to yesterday's holiday off.
See?
Another trade-off.
Other than that, the ride was better than on Sunday.
I generally felt better and a bit more alert with a less tired feeling, although I should have had a peanut butter and jelly sandwich just before I left because my stomach felt a bit empty during the ride.
That tends to steal concentration away.
I made a few stupid maneuvers on the bike where I stalled the engine because I was trying to be too cautious for some reason, but no catastrophes, thankfully.
Blame it on the stomach.
The bike ran very well, by the way.
Off to jerk,
-John
Sunday, September 2, 2012
I Just Caught 391 Germs
It's Sunday evening, and I'm relaxing while eating supper after today's Pachaug ride.
How was it?
Read on.
All-in-all, it was only a fair ride today, and that all started when I woke up feeling less than refreshed since I got about 6 instead of my preferred 8 hours of sleep.
I went to bed plenty early (by 9:00pm), but woke up in the middle of the night for some reason and wasted at least two hours trying to fall back to sleep.
I didn't feel like a total loss while on the bike today, but not 100%, either.
More like 70%.
So, that basically set the tone for the day.
How did the revalved fork perform?
In all honesty, there's no real improvement when the whole ride of 57 miles is mulled over.
Actually, I have to say the stock setup was better overall.
The work Tom did does make for a fork that feels differently, no doubt, but while the absorption of the sharp and pesky bumps (the bigger ones) seems to have improved a bit, the feel of the fork in most other situations is that of now having a firm overall feel where it did not before, similar to how the CRF-450X9 was.
So, while the bigger sharp bumps improved slightly, the smaller sharp bumps are now a problem to deal with - and there are a whole lot of those bumps out on the Pachaug rock n' roll pile.
And, as was with the CRF-450X9 after the revalve done on that bike, the fork seems to work best on my favorite section of pine-needled whoops through the woods (near a pond called Hodge Pond, so I read).
If the whole Pachaug loop were like that, I'd be all set right now.
Well, it aint, so...
What this means is that another valving adjustment is more than likely in store, something that is actually pretty common when trying to dial-in your suspension in this manner.
At least Tom will now have one session in the books and have some results to go on while performing session #2.
What I may try before tomorrow's Labor Day ride is to remove the fork from the bike and lower the oil level 5 or 10mm.
We will see.
I do wonder whether I should simply tell Tom to valve the forks to work on rocks and roots and not to worry about it feeling soft through the Hodge Pond whoops, which has been what I've stressed to him up to this point.
Next time I talk with him, I'll bring this up and ask what he thinks about that idea.
Since 90% of the loop IS full of pesky rocks and roots, maybe that would make sense and I should quit messing around with trying to achieve some kind of (unrealistic?) compromise that works well everywhere..
Yes?
No?
We shall see.
Other than the fork performance, the ride was a decent one.
I did the usual route, and by now that means including the southern part AND the Baby Head Hill trail, although I did take the bypass trail that runs alongside the Boulder Head Hill section.
This second pass through this trail was actually a fair bit easier than the first time last weekend, and that's mainly because I was much more familiar with the lay of the land and was able to know fairly well in advance what was coming up.
I liked it, and I should add it to my normal route.
The bike performed well, as usual, and I now think I'm definitely done with carb fiddling for the time being - no complaints with how the bike ran and responded.
Once again, I was impressed with the low-end torque and light feel of the bike while negotiating the numerous rocky uphills on the southern section.
Good stuff.
I talked to a pair of KTM 2-stroke riders out there today, and we had a decent 15 minute rap session about riding the Pachaug loop and our bikes.
They seemed fairly gung-ho with KTM motorcycles, and that is just fine with me.
Me?
I like blue dirt bikes. ;)
I'll post tomorrow.
-John
How was it?
Read on.
All-in-all, it was only a fair ride today, and that all started when I woke up feeling less than refreshed since I got about 6 instead of my preferred 8 hours of sleep.
I went to bed plenty early (by 9:00pm), but woke up in the middle of the night for some reason and wasted at least two hours trying to fall back to sleep.
I didn't feel like a total loss while on the bike today, but not 100%, either.
More like 70%.
So, that basically set the tone for the day.
How did the revalved fork perform?
In all honesty, there's no real improvement when the whole ride of 57 miles is mulled over.
Actually, I have to say the stock setup was better overall.
The work Tom did does make for a fork that feels differently, no doubt, but while the absorption of the sharp and pesky bumps (the bigger ones) seems to have improved a bit, the feel of the fork in most other situations is that of now having a firm overall feel where it did not before, similar to how the CRF-450X9 was.
So, while the bigger sharp bumps improved slightly, the smaller sharp bumps are now a problem to deal with - and there are a whole lot of those bumps out on the Pachaug rock n' roll pile.
And, as was with the CRF-450X9 after the revalve done on that bike, the fork seems to work best on my favorite section of pine-needled whoops through the woods (near a pond called Hodge Pond, so I read).
If the whole Pachaug loop were like that, I'd be all set right now.
Well, it aint, so...
What this means is that another valving adjustment is more than likely in store, something that is actually pretty common when trying to dial-in your suspension in this manner.
At least Tom will now have one session in the books and have some results to go on while performing session #2.
What I may try before tomorrow's Labor Day ride is to remove the fork from the bike and lower the oil level 5 or 10mm.
We will see.
I do wonder whether I should simply tell Tom to valve the forks to work on rocks and roots and not to worry about it feeling soft through the Hodge Pond whoops, which has been what I've stressed to him up to this point.
Next time I talk with him, I'll bring this up and ask what he thinks about that idea.
Since 90% of the loop IS full of pesky rocks and roots, maybe that would make sense and I should quit messing around with trying to achieve some kind of (unrealistic?) compromise that works well everywhere..
Yes?
No?
We shall see.
Other than the fork performance, the ride was a decent one.
I did the usual route, and by now that means including the southern part AND the Baby Head Hill trail, although I did take the bypass trail that runs alongside the Boulder Head Hill section.
This second pass through this trail was actually a fair bit easier than the first time last weekend, and that's mainly because I was much more familiar with the lay of the land and was able to know fairly well in advance what was coming up.
I liked it, and I should add it to my normal route.
The bike performed well, as usual, and I now think I'm definitely done with carb fiddling for the time being - no complaints with how the bike ran and responded.
Once again, I was impressed with the low-end torque and light feel of the bike while negotiating the numerous rocky uphills on the southern section.
Good stuff.
I talked to a pair of KTM 2-stroke riders out there today, and we had a decent 15 minute rap session about riding the Pachaug loop and our bikes.
They seemed fairly gung-ho with KTM motorcycles, and that is just fine with me.
Me?
I like blue dirt bikes. ;)
I'll post tomorrow.
-John
Saturday, September 1, 2012
I Got Forked 390 Times
These aren't my forks, but they do look like the ones from my WR-250FP.
Today, I got forked-up by Tom at Nasin Machine.
One characteristic about the WR-250FP that I do belive I've mentioned is that, just as with the WR-250FY before it, the rear suspension works better than the front does.
How, specifically?
In situations where you hit sharp, square-edged (or seemingly square-edged) bumps that require the fork to move very quickly if there is any hope of the bump being absorbed in an acceptable manner, the fork needs help.
Kinda' like driving over a speed bump in a parking lot at a high speed and then feeling the sharp jolt sent through your car, the front fork of the WR-250FP, as delivered off the showroom
(10 years ago ;) ), gives a similar result.
That is, bump absorption in this situation could be much better, and after I thought about the fork's performance after last weekend's rides, I decided to have my friend Tom from Nasin Machine revalve the fork to achieve a more supple ride over these pesky (and numerous out on the ol' Pachaug enduro loop) obstacles.
As mentioned in previous posts, the parts that control the flow of the damping oil inside the fork (and rear shock absorber) are able to be changed in order to achieve a suspension setup that works better in certain trail riding situations.
Basically, I brought the forks to Tom and described to him how the forks felt to me, and since he knows from experience what parts need to be changed in order to get the fork performance I want, he went ahead and did just that for me.
Or, he performed what is called a "revalve".
So, I got the forks back today (Saturday), put the bike back together this afternoon, and it is now sitting, ready to go for a Pachaug rock pile ride tomorrow with it's newly revalved fork.
I'll let you know how it works over those sharp bumps that litter the place in numerous spots.
Two other things I did to the bike during the jerk week were to better clean-up and better route my home-made wiring for my taillight/brake light, and I also mounted a mucho better license plate holder, one that angles the plate downward enough to be easily seen from behind while also being much more rugged and apt to withstand thousands of Pachaug miles out in the sticks.
When I got the bike past DMV inspection/registration, one thing I absolutely wanted to do when putting the bike in it's post-inspection setup was to retain the original rear fender which has a taillight already built into it.
Why?
I like the styling, it fit the bike perfectly (since it's the one that belongs there), and the original taillight already has a dual-filament 1157-type bulb in place as well as a bulb socket with an unused third wire that would be capable of illuminating the second brake light filament.
So, all I had to do in order to have a functioning brake light was to connect my rear brake pedal switch to a couple of wires that would power that third tail light bulb socket wire when I step on the rear brake.
Done, uncle Leroy.
Nice, neat, tidy, and using original parts, too.
So, after tomorrow's ride, I'll post back on fork performance and the ride, in general, General.
This weekend is, by the way, Labor Day weekend, so that means Sunday and Monday off from jerk, and I also wonder how many horseback dykes and hikers I may see out there.
Sunday AND Monday rides?
-John
Sunday, August 26, 2012
389 Donuts in the Donut Shop
Today was another Pachaug loop ride day on the WR-250FP, and it was another good one.
I woke feeling more refreshed and energetic than I did yesterday, and that was because on Friday night I was up later than I'd a' liked since I was putting the finishing touches on putting the bike back into it's trail riding set-up and removing the DMV B.S. that I no longer need.
The sun was out brightly and up high in the sky shining almost straight down through the openings in the trees, and while that caused a problem with my eyesight's dislike for brightness, it couldn't prevent me from having a good feel for the bike and pulling-off some good moves.
No doubt about it - this steel-framed WR-250FP has a better feel for locking the rear wheel and using brake sliding to change direction (something I've always liked to do) than the aluminum-framed bikes I rode before it, namely the CRF-450X9 and the WR-250FY.
According to motorcycle chassis wizards, aluminum really isn't the best metal to build a dirt bike frame from but the manufacturers do it because it is "trick", everyone expects to see it on the showrooms, and, maybe the biggest reason, I have read that it actually costs less to produce.
You just know the money grubbers in these major corporations are getting a big woody over that last one. ;)
So, why isn't aluminum the best material for this?
I understand it has to do with it's properties of stiffness, natural vibrating frequency, and resiliency, or lack of it.
Since aluminum is a light metal, the frame spars have to be pretty beefy to be strong enough to do the job.
The side effect of the beefy metal frame parts is that the manufacturers have had to work hard to come up with aluminum frames that have the same feel of the steel frames they replaced.
Or, trying to replicate the feel of a steel frame.
Where the aluminum frames can feel too stiff or make your rear wheel slide out more than you wanted it to while brake sliding, the old-fashioned steel tube frames flex a bit more, absorb bumps better, feel more forgiving, and, allow me to brake slide to my heart's content and allow me to feel precisely what the rear wheel is doing.
And today, I was sliding that rear end around corners left, right, and center.
Great fun, great feeling, and it reminded me of how I rode back when I was a teenager.
Good stuff.
I parked at my normal place, didn't bother to do any carburetor fiddling (since I'm satisfied with how the bike runs, at least for now), rode the usual loop including the southern part, and did 60 miles all together.
I even added another trail I'd ridden only one time before on the CRF-450X9, and that was in the wrong direction.
This trail is nicknamed Baby Head Hill because of the uphill, rock-infested, dried-up stream bed that makes-up the floor of the trail on this one particular hill that the trail's nickname comes from.
I've never enjoyed that kind of terrain because I'm riding a dirt bike, not a rock bike.
So, when I approached the Baby Head Hill section of the trail, I simply ride up what other riders call the bypass trail running along side of it.
It's a tight and twisty trail since it's basically a hastily done afterthought but, it beats riding over boulder city.
Some guys like that stuff, though.
Probably the best thing I got from today's Pachaug rock pile ride was getting better acquainted with the WR-250FP and getting a better feel for the bike and becoming more familiar with riding it.
By now, it's feeling like a good-fitting glove.
I like it. :)
-John
I woke feeling more refreshed and energetic than I did yesterday, and that was because on Friday night I was up later than I'd a' liked since I was putting the finishing touches on putting the bike back into it's trail riding set-up and removing the DMV B.S. that I no longer need.
The sun was out brightly and up high in the sky shining almost straight down through the openings in the trees, and while that caused a problem with my eyesight's dislike for brightness, it couldn't prevent me from having a good feel for the bike and pulling-off some good moves.
No doubt about it - this steel-framed WR-250FP has a better feel for locking the rear wheel and using brake sliding to change direction (something I've always liked to do) than the aluminum-framed bikes I rode before it, namely the CRF-450X9 and the WR-250FY.
According to motorcycle chassis wizards, aluminum really isn't the best metal to build a dirt bike frame from but the manufacturers do it because it is "trick", everyone expects to see it on the showrooms, and, maybe the biggest reason, I have read that it actually costs less to produce.
You just know the money grubbers in these major corporations are getting a big woody over that last one. ;)
So, why isn't aluminum the best material for this?
I understand it has to do with it's properties of stiffness, natural vibrating frequency, and resiliency, or lack of it.
Since aluminum is a light metal, the frame spars have to be pretty beefy to be strong enough to do the job.
The side effect of the beefy metal frame parts is that the manufacturers have had to work hard to come up with aluminum frames that have the same feel of the steel frames they replaced.
Or, trying to replicate the feel of a steel frame.
Where the aluminum frames can feel too stiff or make your rear wheel slide out more than you wanted it to while brake sliding, the old-fashioned steel tube frames flex a bit more, absorb bumps better, feel more forgiving, and, allow me to brake slide to my heart's content and allow me to feel precisely what the rear wheel is doing.
And today, I was sliding that rear end around corners left, right, and center.
Great fun, great feeling, and it reminded me of how I rode back when I was a teenager.
Good stuff.
I parked at my normal place, didn't bother to do any carburetor fiddling (since I'm satisfied with how the bike runs, at least for now), rode the usual loop including the southern part, and did 60 miles all together.
I even added another trail I'd ridden only one time before on the CRF-450X9, and that was in the wrong direction.
This trail is nicknamed Baby Head Hill because of the uphill, rock-infested, dried-up stream bed that makes-up the floor of the trail on this one particular hill that the trail's nickname comes from.
I've never enjoyed that kind of terrain because I'm riding a dirt bike, not a rock bike.
So, when I approached the Baby Head Hill section of the trail, I simply ride up what other riders call the bypass trail running along side of it.
It's a tight and twisty trail since it's basically a hastily done afterthought but, it beats riding over boulder city.
Some guys like that stuff, though.
Probably the best thing I got from today's Pachaug rock pile ride was getting better acquainted with the WR-250FP and getting a better feel for the bike and becoming more familiar with riding it.
By now, it's feeling like a good-fitting glove.
I like it. :)
-John
Saturday, August 25, 2012
388 Jets in the Sky
To jet, or not to jet.
That is the question.
Where is the question mark if it's THE question?
It's Saturday evening, and I'm relaxing with a big bowl of spaghetti as I type this bloggy post.
I went out onto the ol' Pachaug enduro loop today (with a nice and shiny new CT. motorcycle license plate attached to the rear fender of the WR-250FP) intending on doing some more carburetor jetting experimentation.
As it turned out, all of my experimentation boiled down to opening the fuel screw back out to 3-and-a-quarter turns out (close to where it was on the last ride), and that was that.
Basically, I felt that while the carb jetting and throttle response probably isn't as good as it could be, it certainly was just fine and dandy for riding and riding a bike that ran pretty darn good, too.
So, I just left well enough alone with that.
Sometime soon (probably during the jerk week sometime in the near future), I'll try a larger leak jet in order to reduce the amount of gas in the accelerator pump squirt.
Another thing or two that is new is the FMF Powerbomb header and matching FMF Q4 muffler I installed on the bike last night before beddy-bye time.
This is the same brand and model of exhaust parts I used on the CRF-450X9 and the WR-250FY, and as with those other bikes, the WR-250FP now weighs a couple of pounds less and runs even better without being loud enough to be heard in the next county.
The stock muffler is pretty plugged-up in order to meet wicked-low decibel ratings, but with the FMF items, the bike is now breathing well.
I parked the truck near my favorite pine-needled whoop section, made a few laps around it, adjusted the fuel screw on the carb, and then decided to venture out and ride at least most of the Pachaug loop since I was no longer tinkering with the carburetor.
I rode out to the point that is approximately the 15 mile mark on my usual loop route and took it from there, riding the usual route from that point and including the southern part of the loop.
When I got back to the truck, the odometer read 41 miles so that was a decent ride considering I didn't even intend on doing much more than playing with carb settings.
The bike is feeling more familiar to me now that I've ridden it three times, now, and the feel of the bike is very good, indeed.
I do like the steel frame, for sure, and the rear suspension is very supple and does a great job on all of that typical New England rock n' roll terrain we have around here.
As with the ol' WR-250FY, and especially now since putting the FMF exhaust on the bike, the low-end torque and pulling power is very, very good, and combining that with the forgiving nature and bump-absorbing nature of the steel frame, the light-weight feel of the bike, easy handling, and great clutch lever feel and action, this bike really feels good while negotiating the trails.
While climbing numerous rocky hills out on the southern portion of the loop, I thought to myself more than ounce that I'm really liking this WR-250FP.
I'm glad I made the switch. :)
I'm also to the point to where I no longer need my route sheet for the southern loop, too.
When I first pulled in to the parking spot today I saw another pickup truck there, and a few minutes later a guy riding a late-model KTM 200cc 2-stroke pulled in.
A few minutes later as he rested on his tailgate, I went over and chatted about bikes and the Pachaug loop.
Nice guy.
Tomorrow (Sunday) is another normal Pachaug loop in the usual route.
I'll post results of that ride.
-John
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



